21. Ott MA mais aussi al., The trade-away from between hormone contraceptives and you may condoms certainly one of teens, Perspectives with the Sexual and you will Reproductive Fitness, 2002, 34(1):6–fourteen.
twenty-two. Wilson EK and you will Koo Horsepower, Connections anywhere between lower-earnings women’s relationships attributes in addition to their birth control fool around with, Perspectives towards Sexual and you will Reproductive Wellness, 2008, 40(3):171–179.
23. Aalsma MC ainsi que al., Family and you may pal intimacy so you can teenage sexual partners into the link to condom fool around with, Record out of Adolescent Wellness, 2006, 38(3):173–178.
24. Sayegh MA mais aussi al., The brand new developmental connection of relationships top quality, hormonal birth prevention selection and you may condom non-play with one of adolescent feminine, Diary regarding Teenage Fitness, 2006, 39(3):388–395.
25. Umphrey L and you can Sherblom J, Relational partnership and you may threats to relationships restoration wants: has an effect on towards the condom play with, Log of American School Health, 2007, 56(1):61–68.
27. Manning WD et al., More youthful adult relationship matchmaking while the management of sexual risk, Society Browse and you can Policy Comment, 2012, 31(2):165–185.
twenty-eight. Manlove J mais aussi al., Teen moms and dads inside promote worry: chance issues and outcomes for youthfulness in addition to their youngsters, Look Short term, Arizona, DC: Youngster Trend, 2011.
30. DiClemente RJ ainsi que al., Sexual chance practices of the that have old sex people: an examination of black adolescent female, Sexually Sent Disease 2002, 29(1):20–24.
32. Fortenberry JD et al., Condom explore while the a function of amount of time in the and based teenage sexual matchmaking, American Diary away from Public Fitness, 2002, 92(2):211–213.
33. Manlove JS, Ryan S and you will Franzetta K, Chance and protective circumstances of this transition to help you a first sexual reference to an older partner, Journal of Teenage Health, 2007, 40(2):135–143.
34. Manlove J, Ryan S and you will Franzetta K, Birth control play with activities all over teens’ sexual relationships, report demonstrated within annual fulfilling of your own Population Association out-of America, Philadelphia, .
thirty five. Manning WD, Giordano Desktop computer and you may Longmore MA, Connecting: the partnership contexts out of “nonrelationship” sex, Diary from Teenage Search, 2006, 21(5):459–483.
36. Carlson MJ and Furstenberg FF, Jr, The results regarding multi-hitched fertility to own parental info and you will relationships, paper showed within annual fulfilling of the Organization to own Societal Policy Study and you can Government, Arizona, DC, .
37. Lichter DT and Graefe DR, Selecting a pal? The newest relationship and cohabitation histories off unwed moms and dads, in: Wu LL and Wolfe B, eds., Out of Wedlock: Explanations and you may Consequences away from Nonmarital Fertility, Nyc: Russell Sage Basis, 2001, pp. 317–343.
forty. Kirby D, Growing Responses 2007: Research Findings on Applications to attenuate Teenager Pregnancy and you may Sexually Carried Infection, Washington, DC: Federal Campaign to cease Adolescent and you will Unplanned Maternity, 2007.
41. Kirby D, The fresh new impact away from applications to boost birth control explore among mature female: a look at experimental and you may quasi-experimental training, Viewpoints on the Sexual and you will Reproductive Wellness, 2008, 40(1):34–41.
Author’s Associations
Jennifer Manlove are program urban area movie director and elder research researcher, Kate Welti are look researcher, E Wildsmith are senior lookup researcher and Megan Barry is actually lookup specialist, the in the Child Fashion, Bethesda, MD.
Record
In the first analysis, that used a district-area sample out of adolescents within the Kansas, Manning and you may acquaintances 9 grouped relationships services on you to directory away from self-confident attributes (instance intimate thinking-revelation, enchanting love and you may relationship salience) and another list regarding bad services (such as for instance argument and you can nonexclusivity). It found that highest scores check my site into the possibly directory was in fact associated with faster condom structure. Descriptive analyses plus recommended that a variety of large self-confident and you can high bad score try on the reduced condom structure.
Inside for each bullet, professionals were expected «Given that time out of history interview, could you be inside the an online dating dating the place you thought from oneself as part of several?» I thought respondents to stay an internet dating matchmaking once they answered sure whenever brand new companion are a recently available relationships mate, instead of a partner, cohabiting lover otherwise previous partner. Same-sex dating matchmaking and people the spot where the respondent got in earlier times cohabited on companion were excluded. Overall, 4,013 participants advertised a recent relationships relationships during the 2002–2005. Of one’s kept respondents, 553 weren’t on test for the series of great interest, 1,876 have been cohabiting otherwise hitched, and you will 2,542 had no most recent relationship matchmaking. Participants in our sample was indeed aged 18–twenty six.
Relationships connection was predicated on several strategies. The initial are a beneficial 0–ten scale in which participants rated the chance which they and you can its lover would-be to one another for the 6 months. A get regarding no shown not a chance; an effective 10 shown 100% chances. I classified this chances due to the fact lowest (below 6), medium (6–9) otherwise highest (10). Towards the next measure of partnership, i incorporated an adjustable to have if the couples had talked about marriage or cohabitation; solutions had been categorized just like the talked about none, chatted about cohabitation otherwise chatted about relationships. (Participants whom said which have discussed one another cohabitation and you may marriage was basically integrated about marriage classification.)
Heterogeneous birth-control outcomes within long term matchmaking also may help define straight down birth prevention surface from inside the longer adolescent dating, despite greater probability of previously-usage of contraceptives. thirty-two, 33 Prior studies have translated that it seeking from the positing that partners are prepared to occasionally go without birth prevention use in more severe matchmaking; thirty two, 34 although not, our efficiency recommend that shorter birth prevention fool around with may be centered into the long-emergency room term dating described as large dispute minimizing partnership.
Acknowledgments
20. Ku L, Sonenstein Florida and you can Pleck JH, The fictional character away from younger men’s room condom explore throughout the and you will round the relationships, Family relations Believe Viewpoints, 1994, 26(6):246–251.
